Day 2 Task 03 Decision tracking

Task 03. Decision Tracking

Learn project history preservation technology to extract decision-making subjects, approval background, and pending matters from unstructured oral meeting minutes or messenger conversation records through structured archiving.

Task 03 Decision history extraction practice guide

šŸ“„ Practice Input

  • • messenger-chat.md (Transcript of planning-development meeting)

šŸ“¤ Practice output (Output)

  • • Decision Log Table
  • • Pending Items Table

šŸ› ļøPractical guide to follow along

  1. Create conversation log: Click the download button below to download the original planning meeting conversation file. messenger-chat.mdDownload it.
  2. Decision extraction request: In the Codex Client input window, Codex request promptBuild by sending .
  3. Check business context: Analyze whether the grounds for Apple login exclusion (risk of review delay) and reasons for single application of card payment are accurately summarized in the extracted decision-making table.

Download practice materials

Codex request prompt

Task 03 PromptRead the 'messenger-chat.md' conversation log in the project folder and create Decision Log and Pending Items for project management and tracking.

Please perform the analysis according to the conditions below.
1. For matters that have been decided, please fill out the ā€˜Decision Log’ table. The column must include ā€˜decision item’, ā€˜decision content’, ā€˜decision background/basis’, ā€˜decision date’, ā€˜person in charge/subject’, and ā€˜status’.
2. Organize matters that have not yet been decided and require follow-up review or are on hold in the ā€˜Pending Items’ table. In the column, please include ā€˜Pending items’, ā€˜Follow-up details’, ā€˜Person in charge’, and ā€˜Planned due date’.
3. Please do not write fictitious dates or decision-making entities that are not based on the conversation log text.

Expected results report

1. Decision Log

decision item decision Decision-making background/basis decision date Person in charge/subject status
Login method Apply Google Sign-in (pending Apple Sign-in) Apple login was excluded from the first specifications due to the tight development schedule and delay in Apple developer account linkage review. 2026-07-15 PM done
Payment method Credit card payment priority applied The first launch of real-time account transfer payments has been put on hold due to problems with the PG company contract and approval review schedule. 2026-07-16 Development Team (Dev_Lead) In progress
Administrator rights Apply two-level hierarchical permissions (Super/Sub Admin) Final approval and confirmation by PM to meet security audit requirements 2026-07-17 PM done

2. Pending Items

open items Follow-up details person in charge due date
Applicable to Apple Sign-in After holding the first launch, review whether to reintroduce it at the next meeting PM next meeting
Whether overseas payment is supported Technical review for PayPal integration and report of results Development Team (Dev_Lead) PM delivered after technical review

šŸ’” AI utilization and learning points

In the project In terms of risk management, it is 10 times more important to organize the ā€˜background/reason (why)’ than the result information of the decision.do. Learn how to systematically preserve specific context and approval history in messenger/conversation flows using AI.

Flow Connection flow and learning completion of three tasks

Requirements Lifecycle Management Synergy

In order to synchronize planning, design, and development outputs and control decision-making history in actual project work, these three tasks are linked and learned in an organic sequence.

  1. Step 1. Inconsistency detection (Task 01)

    By comparing meeting minutes, requirements definitions, and screen definitions, contradictions and discrepancies between documents are discovered early. (What has changed?)

  2. Step 2. Decision tracking (Task 03)

    By parsing meeting transcripts and messenger records where contradictions occurred, we resolve issues by structuring ā€˜why such a decision was made’ and the history of pending agenda items. (Why has it changed?)

  3. Step 3. Change Management (Task 02)

    Map the scope of sub-screen planning and API design affected by requirements changes (v1.0 āž” v2.0) and create a specific action history. (What needs to be fixed?)

šŸŽ“ Final value of Day 2 practice

Through today's hands-on practice, students will not only operate AI as a simple code generation tool, but also use it to correct complex business design structures and control gaps. ā€˜AI-based project analyst (AI Business Analyst)’Laid the foundation for being reborn.